District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/8/1978
Schlecht v. Schlecht
Citations
- 387 A.2d 575
- 1978 D.C. App. LEXIS 463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Congress has deemed [URE-SA] a remedy for obtaining support and alimony wholly separate from and additional to any other remedies”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kern, Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cyrus v. MondesirDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-10-07· cited 15×
- Edwards v. LateefDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-09· cited 14×
- Padgett v. PadgettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-07-25· cited 14×
- Albus v. AlbusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-01-14· cited 13×
- Harris v. KinardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-03-12· cited 11×
- Nevarez v. NevarezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-03· cited 6×
- Hyatt v. HyattCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-11-08· cited 3×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davidson v. DavidsonWashington Supreme Court· 1965-09-02· cited 32×
- Prager v. Smith Ex Rel. PragerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-11-20· cited 26×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Byrne v. ByrneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-06-14· cited 23×
- Freeland v. FreelandCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1958-05-09· cited 22×
- Craft v. HertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1970-12-23· cited 14×
- Swan v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1971-07-27· cited 14×
- Howze v. HowzeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1967-01-06· cited 12×
- Phelps v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-07-22· cited 9×
- Gamble v. GambleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1969-11-07· cited 9×
- Watson v. DreadinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-09-19· cited 7×
- Rodgers v. RodgersSupreme Court of Colorado· 1958-02-03· cited 5×
- Coumans v. AlbaughNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1955-06-21· cited 4×
- Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Colorado· 1964-11-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.