Hyatt v. Hyatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “doctrine of liberal construction [of remedial statutes] does not permit [a court] to redraft a clearly-written statute, the language of which makes a limited legislative intent apparent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brzowski v. Maryland Home Improvement Commission
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-02-27· cited 20×
• Prince George's County v. Maringo
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-30· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Buchanan v. Alexander
  Supreme Court· 1845-12-10· cited 144×
• Deering v. Deering
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-08· cited 126×
• Bradshaw v. Prince George's County
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-18· cited 90×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-05· cited 64×
• Ohm v. Ohm
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-15· cited 41×
• Keesling v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-10-02· cited 31×
• Dorsey v. Beads
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-07-08· cited 30×
• Witcig v. Witcig
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1980-05-28· cited 26×
• Smith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  First Circuit· 1951-12-10· cited 17×
• Schlecht v. Schlecht
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-05-08· cited 8×
• Green v. Green
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1981-02-26· cited 5×