Skip to main content
· 5/9/1989

Edwards v. Lateef

Citations

  • 558 A.2d 1144
  • 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 82
  • 1989 WL 49620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • URESA does not “affect or amend a substantial right,” and is properly characterized as remedial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Terry, Steadman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.