Skip to main content
· 5/24/1990

Haumont v. Haumont

Citations

  • 793 P.2d 421
  • 135 Utah Adv. Rep. 59
  • 1990 Utah App. LEXIS 94
  • 1990 WL 69056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding property division must be supported by adequate factual findings
  • ‚*T+he trial court may, in the exercise of its broad discretion, divide the property equitably, regardless of its source or time of acquisition.‛
  • purpose of alimony is to maintain the receiving spouse, as nearly as possible, in the same standard of living that existed during the marriage
  • irreconcilable differences subsection “is intended to be a no-fault provision”
  • irreconcilable differences subsection “is intended to be a no-fault provision”
  • noting premarital property generally retained by acquiring spouse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Billings, Garff, Greenwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.