Skip to main content

SCHANTZ v. Rachlin

Citations

  • 244 A.2d 328
  • 101 N.J. Super. 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \customary\ requirement can be met even where the majority of principal permitted uses do not involve the proposed accessory use
  • findmg that the township’s definition of accessory did not include the customarily incidental language and the landing -strip did not change the primary use of the property as a residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named SCHANTZ v. Rachlin

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.