Skip to main content
· 12/1/1954

In Re the Application of Emmett S. Hickman Co.

Citations

  • 108 A.2d 667
  • 49 Del. 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It seems clear that a parking lot could not be established in a residential district as accessory solely to property in a business district in the absence of facts justifying a variance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Southerland, Bramhall, Herrmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.