Food Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that establishment where patrons would purchase food and then eat the food in their cars in parking area was a “restaurant” because food was eaten “on the premises”
• If use of land for off-street parking is accessory use customarily incidental to operation of restaurant, applicant is entitled to accessory use as matter of right.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).