Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2625
Syllabus
On objections and motions, the Court adopted the Special Master's Report and Recommendation, overruled Requester's Objections, denied Respondent's Motion To Strike contained within Respondent's Response, and denied Requester's Motion For Leave. In accordance with the Special Master's recommendations, with respect to procedural motions before the Special Master, the Court (1) denied Respondent's Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motions for dismissal, (2) granted in part, and denied in part, Requester's motions to strike, striking late filed evidence and denying the imposition of other sanctions, and (3) denied Respondent's motions to strike as moot. With respect to the Special Master's recommendations as to the merits of consolidated Ct. of Cl. Nos. 2024-00226PQ, 2024-00248PQ, and 2024-00292PQ, the Court found that (1) Requester was not aggrieved by Respondent responding to Requester's individual requests on a consolidated basis, and (2) Respondent violated R.C. 149.43(B)(1) in those instances when it took more than five working days to produce the public records sought. The Court also denied all other relief sought in these cases. With respect to merits of Ct. of Cl. No. 2024-00293PQ, the Court ordered Respondent to (1) produce all public records responsive to part 3 of Requester's public records request of January 17, 2024, (2) produce all additional public records responsive to part 4 of that request or to certify that no additional responsive records exist, (3) produce all public records responsive to part 6 of that request, as amended on February 12, 2024, and (4) redact all those records to protect third parties' statutory privacy rights. Additionally, the Court found that Respondent violated R.C. 149.43(B)(1) by unreasonably delaying production of certain records sought. The Court denied all other relief sought in Ct. of Cl. No. 2024-00293PQ. The Court determined that Requester was entitled to recover from Respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any
Judges: Sadler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schaffer v. SheetsOhio Court of Claims· 2025-03-11· cited 5×
- Hastings v. Washington Court House Bldg. & Zoning Dept.Ohio Court of Claims· 2025-03-04· cited 2×
- Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims· 2024-09-12· cited 1×
- Martin v. Accel Schools OhioOhio Court of Claims· 2024-11-25· cited 1×
- Dye v. ClevelandOhio Court of Claims· 2025-06-03· cited 1×
- Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims· 2024-11-07
- Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims· 2025-02-13
- Hanson v. Etna Twp.Ohio Court of Claims· 2025-07-14
- NW Ohio Innocence Clinic v. Lucas Cty. Prosecutor's OfficeOhio Court of Claims· 2026-02-26
- Diebert v. Village of N. Baltimore Adm.Ohio Court of Claims· 2026-05-22
- Diebert v. N. Baltimore Police Dept.Ohio Court of Claims· 2026-05-22
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-11-24· cited 218×
- DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court· 1982-02-10· cited 198×
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-04-17· cited 142×
- State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-20· cited 119×
- The STATE EX REL. CORDELL v. PADEN, Sheriff.Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-04-04· cited 100×
- State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court· 1996-10-08· cited 91×
- State Ex Rel. Carr v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 80×
- Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 78×
- State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1998-02-11· cited 76×
- State ex rel. Shaughnessy v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-29· cited 61×
- State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-01-22· cited 31×
- Clifford L. Strout v. U.S. Parole CommissionSixth Circuit· 1994-10-17· cited 17×
- Hawkins v. Marion Correctional InstituteOhio Supreme Court· 1986-12-05· cited 16×
- Doe v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims· 2024-01-30· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.