Clifford L. Strout v. U.S. Parole Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding redaction under Exemption 6 of identity of individuals who wrote to the Parole Commission opposing Strout’s parole
• upholding redaction 4 of identity of individuals who wrote to the Parole Commission opposing parole
• interpreting the privacy exemption as protecting the mission of the institution in possession of the records as well as the privacy interests of those individuals who would be directly affected by disclosure
• finding consider- able privacy interest in individuals writing to oppose parole request
• names and addresses of people who wrote to Parole Commission opposing a convict’s parole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).