Ninth Circuit· 11/24/2008
Scarff v. Intuit, Inc.
Citations
- 318 F. App'x 483
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no judicial admission where party’s language was ambiguous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Del P. Henry, Jr., a Single Man, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gill Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1993-01-12· cited 575×
- Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. BehrensNinth Circuit· 2008-09-26· cited 533×
- Sylvia Dominguez-Curry v. Nevada Transportation Department Roc StaceyNinth Circuit· 2005-09-14· cited 363×
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-07-20· cited 203×
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2007-02-28· cited 194×
- OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2007-12-05· cited 130×
- Robert E. Kennedy v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2004-08-18· cited 76×
- Insurance Company of North America, a Corporation Zomaya Group, Inc., a Corporation v. Federal Express Corporation, a Corporation,defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1999-08-30· cited 50×
- Hurlic v. Southern California Gas Co.Ninth Circuit· 2008-08-20· cited 27×
- Kephart v. Genuity, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2006-02-01· cited 19×
Other cases named Scarff v. Intuit, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.