California Court of Appeal· 2/1/2006
Kephart v. Genuity, Inc.
Citations
- 38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 845
- 136 Cal. App. 4th 280
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 987
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 1385
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 128
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- under California law, whether an employee’s tortious act falls within the scope of his official duties is generally a factual question for a jury
- under California law, whether an employee’s tortious act falls within the scope of his official duties is generally a factual question for a jury
- “An employee who is going to work, or coming from work, is within the scope of employment if the employee is on a special errand, either as part of his or her regular duties or at a specific order or request of the employer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scotland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2016-02-11· cited 138×
- PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-04-30· cited 79×
- Minnegren v. NozarCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-10-24· cited 43×
- Jeewarat v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2009-09-03· cited 26×
- Moradi v. Marsh USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2013-09-17· cited 16×
- Newland v. Cnty. of L. A.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-06-18· cited 15×
- Montague v. Amn Healthcare, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2014-02-21· cited 12×
- Scarff v. Intuit, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-11-24· cited 2×
- Montague v. AMN HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-03-13
- Newland v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-06-18
- Musgrove v. SilverCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-08-25
- Musgrove v. SilverCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-09-13
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court· 1972-10-17· cited 336×
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-12-26· cited 193×
- Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 188×
- Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1986-06-23· cited 164×
- Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court· 1977-07-21· cited 100×
- Alma W. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-08-28· cited 76×
- Fields v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-03-25· cited 62×
- Huntsinger v. Glass Containers Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1972-01-11· cited 49×
- Miller v. StoufferCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-08-31· cited 46×
- Le Elder v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-01-21· cited 32×
- Tognazzini v. San Luis Coastal Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal· 2001-01-31· cited 31×
- Felix v. AsaiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-06-15· cited 27×
- Yamaguchi v. HarnsmutCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-01-29· cited 20×
- American Employer's Insurance Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-04-24· cited 17×
- County of Mariposa v. Yosemite West AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-06-30· cited 14×
- O'CONNOR v. McDonald's RestaurantsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-04-26· cited 6×
- Hoblitzell v. CITY OF IONECalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-07-14· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.