Skip to main content
· 2/1/2006

Kephart v. Genuity, Inc.

Citations

  • 38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 845
  • 136 Cal. App. 4th 280
  • 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 987
  • 2006 Daily Journal DAR 1385
  • 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under California law, whether an employee’s tortious act falls within the scope of his official duties is generally a factual question for a jury
  • under California law, whether an employee’s tortious act falls within the scope of his official duties is generally a factual question for a jury
  • “An employee who is going to work, or coming from work, is within the scope of employment if the employee is on a special errand, either as part of his or her regular duties or at a specific order or request of the employer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scotland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.