Skip to main content
· 9/26/2008

Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. Behrens

Citations

  • 546 F.3d 580
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20335
  • 2008 WL 4368216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts “need not accept as true allegations 27 contradicting documents that are referenced in the complaint.”
  • holding that a class-based equal protection arises when the “law is applied in a discriminatory manner or imposes different burdens on different classes of people” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • holding that a class-based equal protection claim arises when the “law is applied in a discriminatory manner or imposes different burdens on different classes of people” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • holding that a class-based equal protection claim arises when the “law is applied in a discriminatory manner or imposes different burdens on different classes of people” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • noting that even when the classification is clear, plaintiffs may challenge the legitimacy of defendants’ asserted rationale for any classification
  • discussing, but declining to rule on, the ability of a district court to strike 9 documents submitted as exhibits to a motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Canby, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.