· 9/26/2008
Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. Behrens
Citations
- 546 F.3d 580
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20335
- 2008 WL 4368216
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts “need not accept as true allegations 27 contradicting documents that are referenced in the complaint.”
- holding that a class-based equal protection arises when the “law is applied in a discriminatory manner or imposes different burdens on different classes of people” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- holding that a class-based equal protection claim arises when the “law is applied in a discriminatory manner or imposes different burdens on different classes of people” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- holding that a class-based equal protection claim arises when the “law is applied in a discriminatory manner or imposes different burdens on different classes of people” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- noting that even when the classification is clear, plaintiffs may challenge the legitimacy of defendants’ asserted rationale for any classification
- discussing, but declining to rule on, the ability of a district court to strike 9 documents submitted as exhibits to a motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson, Canby, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.