Federal Circuit· 6/16/1999
Scaltech Inc. v. Retec/tetra, L.L.C.
Citations
- 178 F.3d 1378
- 1999 WL 357606
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the “subject of the barring activity [must] [have] met each of the limitations of the claim”
- recognizing that product sold must meet each limitation of the disputed patent claim
- rejecting requirement “that the offer specifically identify these limitations” so long as “the process that was offered for sale inherently possessed each of the claim limitations”
- “The ‘invention’ which has been offered for sale must, of course, be something within the scope of the claim.”
- “[T]he first determination in the § 102(b) analysis must be whether the subject of the bar- ring activity met each of the limitations of the claim.”
- “We note that there is no requirement that the offer specifically identify these limitations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rich, Plager, Gajarsa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyFederal Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 341×
- Ez Dock, Inc. v. Schafer Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2002-01-15· cited 67×
- Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc., Unique Beverage Dispensers, Inc., David Fox, and Bruce BurwickFederal Circuit· 2002-06-07· cited 63×
- In Re John KollarFederal Circuit· 2002-04-11· cited 61×
- Scaltech, Inc. v. Retec/tetra, LLC, Defendant-CrossFederal Circuit· 2001-10-23· cited 49×
- A.K. Stamping Co. v. Instrument Specialties Co.D. New Jersey· 2000-07-19· cited 36×
- Abbott Laboratories v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novopharm Limited, and Invamed, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1999-08-05· cited 35×
- Dana Corporation v. American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2002-02-12· cited 35×
- Stx, Llc, (Formerly Known as Stx, Inc.) v. Brine, Inc., and Warrior Lacrosse, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2000-04-13· cited 29×
- Elan Corporation, Plc v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendant-CrossFederal Circuit· 2004-05-05· cited 27×
- Netscape Communications Corp. v. KonradFederal Circuit· 2002-07-09· cited 27×
- Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Athena Neurosciences, Inc. v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and ResearchFederal Circuit· 2002-08-30· cited 16×
- LEADER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Facebook, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-05-08· cited 16×
- Bose Corp. v. JBL, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2000-08-31· cited 9×
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.D. Delaware· 2004-11-12· cited 8×
- In Re Buspirone Patent LitigationS.D. New York· 2002-02-14· cited 8×
- Netscape Communications Corp. v. Valueclick, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2010-01-29· cited 8×
- Minton v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2002-02-01· cited 6×
- Tec Air, Inc. v. Denso Manufacturing Michigan Inc.Federal Circuit· 1999-09-30· cited 6×
- Mformation Techs., Inc. v. Research in Motion Ltd.N.D. California· 2011-12-19· cited 6×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court· 1950-10-09· cited 1,620×
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court· 1878-05-13· cited 431×
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-12-14· cited 353×
- Continental Can Company Usa, Inc. And Continental Pet Technologies, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, Hoover Universal, Inc. And Johnson Controls, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1991-12-26· cited 310×
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1993-01-26· cited 253×
- Titanium Metals Corporation of America v. Donald W. Banner, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksFederal Circuit· 1985-11-07· cited 148×
- Verdegaal Brothers, Inc., William Verdegaal, George Verdegaal v. Union Oil Company of California, Brea Agricultural Services, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1987-03-12· cited 140×
- Rca Corporation v. Data General Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1989-10-11· cited 83×
- In Re William J. KingFederal Circuit· 1986-09-19· cited 62×
- Steven G. Lough v. Brunswick Corporation, D/B/A Mercury MarineFederal Circuit· 1996-06-12· cited 59×
- Sonoscan, Inc. v. Sonotek, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1991-06-12· cited 18×
- KeyStone Retaining Wall Systems, Inc. v. Westrock, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1993-06-29· cited 17×
Other cases named Scaltech Inc. v. Retec/tetra, L.L.C.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.