Dana Corporation v. American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• district court “erroneously invoked the ‘totality of the circumstances’ test that was disavowed by Pfaff.”
• “Such an independent evaluation is necessary 13 because dependent claims necessarily add limitations to the claims from which they depend and 14 may therefore not be subject to the same asserted grounds of invalidity.”
• “Such an 10 independent evaluation is necessary because dependent claims necessarily add limitations to the 11 claims from which they depend and may therefore not be subject to the same asserted grounds of 12 invalidity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).