S.B. Thomas, Inc. v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the stronger the case for the causal connection even absent expert medical testimony, the lesser the need for [expert] testimony; the weaker the non-medical case for the causal connection, the greater the need for [expert] testimony”
• explaining that “the stronger the case for the causal connection even absent expert medical testimony, the lesser the need for [expert] testimony; the weaker the non-medical case for the causal connection, the greater the need for [expert] testimony”
• explaining the difference between the two alternative modes of appeal from a decision by the Commission
• affirming decision that a complex medical question required expert medical testimony
• “the stronger the case for the causal connection even absent expert medical testimony, the lesser the need for such testimony; the weaker the non-medical case for the causal connection, the greater the need for such testimony”
• expert needed to link back injury with herniated disc eight months later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).