Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 3/4/1997

S.B. Thomas, Inc. v. Thompson

Citations

689 A.2d 1301
114 Md. App. 357
1997 Md. App. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “the stronger the case for the causal connection even absent expert medical testimony, the lesser the need for [expert] testimony; the weaker the non-medical case for the causal connection, the greater the need for [expert] testimony”
explaining that “the stronger the case for the causal connection even absent expert medical testimony, the lesser the need for [expert] testimony; the weaker the non-medical case for the causal connection, the greater the need for [expert] testimony”
explaining the difference between the two alternative modes of appeal from a decision by the Commission
affirming decision that a complex medical question required expert medical testimony
“the stronger the case for the causal connection even absent expert medical testimony, the lesser the need for such testimony; the weaker the non-medical case for the causal connection, the greater the need for such testimony”
expert needed to link back injury with herniated disc eight months later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Harrell, Salmon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.