Kraft v. Freedman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that expert testimony was necessary to prove the causal relationship between an automobile accident allegedly resulting in the recurrence of plaintiffs ileitis
• expert testimony needed for ileitis symptoms because complicated medical question and no legally sufficient evidence to establish that flare up was caused by accident
• expert needed to link car crash with recurrence of preexisting ileitis, an inflammation of the small intestine
• expert needed to link car crash with recurrence of preexisting ileitis, an inflammation of the small intestine
• expert needed to link car crash with recurrence of preexisting ileitis, an inflammation of the small intestine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).