Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/29/2009
Elste v. Isg Sparrows Point, LLC
Citations
- 982 A.2d 938
- 188 Md. App. 634
- 2009 Md. App. LEXIS 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- because the statute under review was remedial, “[a]ny uncertainty in the law should be resolved in favor of the claimant, and thus interpretation of its provisions may depend upon whether its terms are clear or ambiguous”
- because the statute under review was remedial, “[a]ny uncertainty in the law should be resolved in favor of the claimant, and thus interpretation of its provisions may depend upon whether its terms are clear or ambiguous”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panel: Deborah S. Eyler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 20×
- Barnes v. Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-21· cited 18×
- Francis v. JohnsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-06· cited 14×
- Cunningham v. Baltimore Cnty.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-01· cited 9×
- 600 North Frederick Road, LLC v. Burlington Coat FactoryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-22· cited 7×
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-06-18· cited 7×
- Newsom v. Brock & Scott, PLLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-11-24· cited 4×
- In the Matter of the Petition of HoseinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-08-14· cited 3×
- Len Stoler, Inc. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2017-01-25· cited 2×
- In re: City of HagerstownCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-05-30
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fowler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-10-20· cited 108×
- Serio v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-14· cited 60×
- Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-08· cited 59×
- Allstate Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-03-05· cited 51×
- Jacobs v. FlynnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-25· cited 50×
- Design Kitchen and Baths v. LagosCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-12· cited 48×
- Holman v. Kelly Catering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-04-15· cited 44×
- Cutno v. Neeb Kearney & CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1959-06-01· cited 42×
- Giant Food, Inc. v. BookerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-09-03· cited 37×
- General Motors Corp. v. BarkCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-31· cited 36×
- S.B. Thomas, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-03-04· cited 35×
- General Accident Insurance v. ScottCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-01-03· cited 34×
- James v. General Motors Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-08· cited 25×
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. ReadingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-29· cited 24×
- Cavacos v. SarwarCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-08-04· cited 22×
- J. Ashley Corp. v. BursonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-26· cited 10×
- Holmes v. J.E. Merit Constructors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1997-10-29· cited 6×
- Dawkins v. Capitol Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-05-01· cited 3×
- Fukuda v. Peerless Roofing Co.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1974-06-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.