D. Puerto Rico· 6/5/1997
Savis, Inc. v. Warner Lambert, Inc.
Citations
- 967 F. Supp. 632
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8879
- 1997 WL 348482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “[w]here a corporation is engaged in a single enterprise, substantially all of whose operations occur in one state, even though policy and administrative decisions are made elsewhere, the state of operations is the corporation’s principal place of business”
- noting that no other circuit has recognized the center of corporate activity and locus of operations tests as distinct
- Principal place of business was Puerto Rico where substantially all business activities occurred here, even though policy and administrative decisions were made elsewhere
- Nerve center test not applicable when all of corporation’s operations were located in Puerto Rico
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pieras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Diaz-Rodriguez v. Pep Boys Corp.First Circuit· 2005-06-03· cited 39×
- Caribbean Mushroom Co., Inc. v. Government Development BankD. Puerto Rico· 1997-11-13· cited 11×
- Rivera-Lebron v. Cellular OneD. Puerto Rico· 1998-07-17· cited 4×
- Able Sales Co. v. Mead Johnson Puerto Rico, Inc.D. Puerto Rico· 2006-03-07· cited 4×
- Salzano-Pascuzzi v. Lucas Insertco Pharmaceutical Printing Co. of P.R.D. Puerto Rico· 2001-02-23· cited 3×
- Sanchez v. UHS of Puerto Rico, Inc.D. Puerto Rico· 2002-09-24· cited 1×
- Barnes v. Farmland National Beef Packing Co.D. Kansas· 2001-09-26
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court· 1936-05-18· cited 4,144×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court· 1947-04-07· cited 1,339×
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court· 1938-12-19· cited 890×
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court· 1942-03-02· cited 513×
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1993-06-18· cited 504×
- Rachel L. FENNELL, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. FIRST STEP DESIGNS, LTD, D/B/A Hand-In-Hand, Defendant, AppelleeFirst Circuit· 1996-05-15· cited 217×
- Blackburn v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1996-11-19· cited 211×
- Capron v. Van NoordenSupreme Court· 1804-03-18· cited 209×
- Media Duplication Services, Ltd. v. Hdg Software, Inc., Joseph WineFirst Circuit· 1991-04-23· cited 128×
- Lee J. Topp v. Compair Incorporated, Compair Limited, Siebe Plc and E. Barrie StephensFirst Circuit· 1987-03-27· cited 89×
- U.S.I. Properties Corp. v. M.D. Construction Company, Inc., Appeal of Compania De Desarrollo CooperativoFirst Circuit· 1988-10-25· cited 81×
- Miguel Angel Chaparro-Febus v. International Longshoremen Association, Local 1575First Circuit· 1993-01-04· cited 81×
- Amoco Rocmount Co. v. Anschutz Corp.Tenth Circuit· 1993-09-13· cited 73×
- Harris v. Black Clawson Co.Fifth Circuit· 1992-05-26· cited 63×
- Vareka Investments, N v. a Netherlands Antilles Corp. v. American Investment Properties, Inc., a Florida Corp.Eleventh Circuit· 1984-03-21· cited 59×
- Gidel Rivera-Flores v. Bristol-Myers Squibb CaribbeanFirst Circuit· 1997-04-25· cited 57×
- McAllister v. Federal Deposit InsuranceFifth Circuit· 1996-07-17· cited 43×
- Fernando Rodriguez v. Sk & F Co.First Circuit· 1987-11-10· cited 36×
- White v. Halstead Industries, Inc.E.D. Arkansas· 1990-10-09· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.