Savinsky v. Bromley Group, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the defendant 19 established a prima facie case for purposes of summary judgment by showing that it 7 1 did not have the ability to control the work of the alleged employee
• stating that the opponent of a summary judgment motion cannot “rely solely on the allegations contained in its complaint ... [but] must ... establish, with admissible evidence, that a genuine issue of fact exists” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• summary judgment appropriate when facts are not in dispute and the only question to be resolved is the legal effect of the facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).