Keith v. MANORCARE, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judicial estoppel did not apply, because employment status was not 5 at issue in the hearings and motions cited
• holding that judicial estoppel did not apply, because employment status was not at issue in the hearings and motions cited
• holding that judicial estoppel did not apply, because employment status was not at issue in the hearings and motions cited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).