Ninth Circuit· 3/20/2003
Satava v. Lowry
Citations
- 323 F.3d 805
- 2003 WL 1344503
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff’s “selection of the clear glass, oblong shroud, bright colors, proportion, vertical orientation, and stereotyped jellyfish form [for his sculptures], considered together, lack[ed] the quantum of originality needed”
- recognizing that an artist “may, however, protect the original expression he or she contributes to these ideas” including “the pose, attitude, gesture, muscle structure, facial expression, coat, or texture of [the] animal . . . and the background, lighting, or perspective”
- explaining that the original “pose, attitude, gesture, muscle structure, facial expression, coat, or texture of [an] animal” may be protectable
- holding similarity of six different elements \lacks the quantum of originality needed to merit copyright protection.\
- observing that scope of copyright protection for realistic depiction of live animal was narrow and noting that “[t]hese ideas, first expressed by nature, are the common heritage of humankind, and no artist may use copyright law to prevent others from depicting them”
- glass-in-glass jellyfish sculpture only entitled to thin protection against virtually identical copying due to the narrow range of expression
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gould, Silverman, Weiner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Warsoldier v. WoodfordNinth Circuit· 2005-07-29· cited 197×
- L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2012-04-09· cited 101×
- Coquico, Inc. v. Rodriguez-MirandaFirst Circuit· 2009-04-06· cited 91×
- Jacobus Rentmeester v. Nike, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2018-02-27· cited 87×
- Design Basics, LLC v. Lexington Homes, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2017-06-06· cited 76×
- Satava v. LowryNinth Circuit· 2003-03-20· cited 58×
- Swirsky v. CareyNinth Circuit· 2004-08-24· cited 49×
- Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. GloverNinth Circuit· 2007-03-09· cited 47×
- Diane M. Hendricks Kenneth A. Hendricks v. Bank of America, N.A., and Mutual Indemnity (Bermuda), Ltd., a Bermuda CorporationNinth Circuit· 2005-05-24· cited 39×
- Pieter Folkens v. Wyland WorldwideNinth Circuit· 2018-02-13· cited 34×
- William Darden v. Marybeth Peters, Register of CopyrightsFourth Circuit· 2007-05-24· cited 21×
- Batiste v. NajmE.D. Louisiana· 2014-06-25· cited 15×
- Erickson v. BlakeD. Oregon· 2012-03-14· cited 13×
- Pharrell Williams v. Frankie GayeNinth Circuit· 2018-03-21· cited 10×
- Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. GloverNinth Circuit· 2006-09-20· cited 9×
- Wilson v. BrennanD. New Mexico· 2009-08-18· cited 7×
- Lucky Break Wishbone Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.W.D. Washington· 2007-12-04· cited 5×
- Real View, LLC. v. 20-20 Technologies, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2010-02-11· cited 4×
- Wengerd v. E. Wayne Fire Dist.Ohio Court of Claims· 2017-11-08· cited 4×
- Morrill v. StefaniC.D. California· 2018-10-02· cited 4×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court· 1991-03-27· cited 2,678×
- TWENTIETH CENTURY MUSIC CORP. Et Al. v. AIKENSupreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 233×
- Three Boys Music Corp. v. BoltonNinth Circuit· 2000-05-09· cited 194×
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1994-09-19· cited 177×
- John William See v. Christopher Durang and L.A. Stage CompanyNinth Circuit· 1983-07-22· cited 164×
- Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Edward and Lucy Kalpakian, Etc.Ninth Circuit· 1971-07-07· cited 134×
- Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2000-08-18· cited 110×
- Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Company, an Illinois CorporationNinth Circuit· 1970-07-10· cited 103×
- Shelley Aliotti and John Aliotti v. R. Dakin & Co., a California CorporationNinth Circuit· 1987-11-04· cited 69×
- United States v. Peninsula Communications, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2002-04-22· cited 67×
- CDN INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth A. KAPES, an Individual D/B/A Western Reserve Numismatics, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1999-12-02· cited 55×
- Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2003-03-14· cited 49×
- United States v. Edward Sylvester HamiltonNinth Circuit· 1978-10-05· cited 40×
- Kamar International, Inc. v. Russ Berrie And Co.Ninth Circuit· 1981-09-28· cited 33×
Other cases named Satava v. Lowry
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.