Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/20/2003

Satava v. Lowry

Citations

  • 323 F.3d 805
  • 2003 WL 1344503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s “selection of the clear glass, oblong shroud, bright colors, proportion, vertical orientation, and stereotyped jellyfish form [for his sculptures], considered together, lack[ed] the quantum of originality needed”
  • recognizing that an artist “may, however, protect the original expression he or she contributes to these ideas” including “the pose, attitude, gesture, muscle structure, facial expression, coat, or texture of [the] animal . . . and the background, lighting, or perspective”
  • explaining that the original “pose, attitude, gesture, muscle structure, facial expression, coat, or texture of [an] animal” may be protectable
  • holding similarity of six different elements \lacks the quantum of originality needed to merit copyright protection.\
  • observing that scope of copyright protection for realistic depiction of live animal was narrow and noting that “[t]hese ideas, first expressed by nature, are the common heritage of humankind, and no artist may use copyright law to prevent others from depicting them”
  • glass-in-glass jellyfish sculpture only entitled to thin protection against virtually identical copying due to the narrow range of expression

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gould, Silverman, Weiner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Satava v. Lowry

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.