Skip to main content
· 4/9/2012

L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc.

Citations

  • 676 F.3d 841
  • 102 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1382
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7079
  • 2012 WL 1150273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reasonable possibility of access can be established if the work was widely disseminated among a specific industry
  • permitting mid-litigation supplementary registration fixing error for single unpublished collection registration
  • “Summary judgment is ‘not highly favored’ on questions of substantial similarity in copyright cases.” (citation omitted)
  • “Summary judgment is ‘not highly favored’ on questions of substantial similarity in copyright cases.” (citation omitted)
  • local sale of 50,000 yards of fabric over four-year period created a reasonable inference that defendants had opportunity to view and copy the design
  • “[A] misstatement or clerical error in the registration application, if unaccompanied by fraud, should neither invalidate the copyright nor render the registration certificate incapable of supporting an infringement action.” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dorothy W. Nelson, Ronald M. Gould, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.