Erickson v. Blake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiffs claim because his complaint “does not plausibly plead facts suggesting that the University ever received a complaint against a female student comparable to that filed against [the plaintiff] ... and treated the female student more favorably.”
• ‘‘consideration of facts outside of the complaint [is] inappropriate . . . on a motion to dis- miss’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).