Saody Eng, V. Specialized Loan Servicing, Llc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Remanding in part because the trial court erroneously 6 dismissed a CPA claim where borrower was entitled to rebuttable presumption of 7 reliance
• trial court erroneously dismissed CPA claim where borrower was 22 entitled to rebuttable presumption of reliance
• trial court erroneously dismissed CPA claim where borrower was 11 entitled to rebuttable presumption of reliance
• creditor may, through foreclosure, “enforce . . . actionable past due installments but not . . . time-barred past due installments”
• “Even a truthful statement can be deceptive if it creates a misleading ‘net impression.’” (quoting State v. Living Essentials, LLC, 436 P.3d 857, 865 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).