Skip to main content

Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy

Citations

  • 165 Wash. 2d 595
  • 200 P.3d 695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • same for negligence claims against medical professionals (citing Quimby v. Fine, 45 Wn. App. 175, 180, 724 P.2d 403 (1986))
  • “[T]here must be shown a real 9 and substantial potential for repetition, as opposed to a hypothetical possibility of 10 an isolated unfair or deceptive act's being repeated.”
  • debtor alleging a CPA violation for attempting to collect time-barred debt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanders, Alexander, Johnson, Madsen, Chambers, Owens, Fairhurst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.