Skip to main content

State v. Reader's Digest Ass'n

Citations

  • 501 P.2d 290
  • 81 Wash. 2d 259
  • 1972 Wash. LEXIS 731
  • 1972 Trade Cas. (CCH) 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that unfair competition cause of action arose from contacts because mailing sweepstakes entry information constituted illegal lottery within state
  • holding that Washington court had jurisdiction over foreign defendant that advertised there, noting that “[i]f our courts are not open, the state will be without a remedy in any court and the Consumer Protection Act will be rendered useless”
  • findings of fact that are actually conclusions of law treated as conclusion of law
  • “unfair or deceptive acts or practices” statute, authorizing only civil penalties, is not unconstitutionally vague
  • Reader's Digest Sweepstakes lottery per se violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stafford, Finley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

132 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.