Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an attorney’s failure to monitor the court’s docket is not “excusable neglect” under Rule 60(b)(1)
• noting that an attorney’s failure to monitor the court’s docket is not “excusable neglect” under Rule 60(b)(1)
• noting that “excusable neglect” is a “demanding standard” and such an “exceptional justification must be something more than an attorney’s failure to monitor the court’s electronic docket”
• “Demonstrating excusable neglect is a demanding standard.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• exceptional justification necessary for Rule 60(b) relief “must.be something more than.an attorney’s failure to monitor the court’s electronic docket”
• “[P]arties who fail to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).