Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/27/2002
Santiago v. State
Citations
- 261 Conn. 533
- 804 A.2d 801
- 2002 Conn. LEXIS 400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statute is mandatory if it addresses matter of substance. If it is simply a matter of convenience, it is considered directory
- holding that statute is mandatory if it addresses matter of substance. If it is simply a matter of convenience, it is considered directory
- noncompliance with directory statute ‘‘will not invalidate any future proceedings contem- plated by the statute unless the noncompliance has prejudiced the opposing party’’
- noncompliance with mandatory provision will invalidate any future proceedings contemplated by statute
- noncompliance with mandatory provision will invalidate any future proceedings con- templated by statute
- mandatory statutory provisions are \typically\ subject to waiver
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Palmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- St. George v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-01· cited 38×
- Weems v. Citigroup, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-12-30· cited 35×
- Daniel W. Thomas v. William Ray McDermitt and State Farm Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2013-10-07· cited 20×
- Pereira v. State Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-02-28· cited 14×
- Blondeau v. BaltierraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-09-24· cited 14×
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-02-26· cited 7×
- State v. MunozConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-10-02· cited 6×
- State v. McGinnisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-07-06· cited 6×
- Belcher v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-01-30· cited 4×
- Carter v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-11-05· cited 2×
- Arras v. Regional School District No. 14Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-10-20
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-07-05
- Reyes v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-02-15
- Ramos v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-12-02
- Thompson v. ZagajaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-06-16
- Stanley v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-06-30
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 582×
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-18· cited 407×
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court· 1991-02-19· cited 398×
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-02· cited 115×
- Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-05-16· cited 95×
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-07· cited 91×
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 71×
- Metropolitan District Commission v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 4, Local 184Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-21· cited 54×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hillcrest AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-16· cited 43×
- Katz v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-01· cited 38×
- Stewart v. Tunxis Service CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-21· cited 33×
- Seebeck v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-25· cited 33×
- Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-22· cited 29×
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-03-10· cited 6×
- Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-09-13· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.