Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that other factors, besides defendants’ lead pigment, may have caused or contributed to plaintiffs injury
• refusing to apply market share theory — and, therefore, to relax the identification requirement — because of the “possibility that the defendants did not cause the harm in question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'n
  Third Circuit· 1993-05-11· cited 75×
• Monica Santiago v. Sherwin Williams Company
  First Circuit· 1993-09-10· cited 37×
• City Of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Association, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1993-05-11· cited 33×
• City of New York v. Lead Industries Ass'n
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-05-13· cited 25×
• CHAPMAN EX REL. EST. OF CHAPMAN v. Bernard's Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 2001-09-20· cited 22×
• Veil v. Vitek, Inc.
  D. North Dakota· 1992-09-18· cited 16×
• City of Chicago v. American Cyanamid Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-01-14· cited 11×
• Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
  D. Massachusetts· 1992-07-02· cited 9×
• Town of Lexington v. Pharmacia Corp.
  D. Massachusetts· 2015-09-23· cited 3×
• Goodrich v. Cequent Performance Prods., Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2018-01-16· cited 1×
• Russo v. Material Handling Specialties Co.
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 1995-08-29· cited 1×
• Santiago v. Sherwin Williams,eta
  First Circuit· 1993-09-24

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
  Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
• Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
• Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1990-02-06· cited 1,440×
• Summers v. Tice
  California Supreme Court· 1948-11-17· cited 428×
• Payton v. Abbott Labs
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-06-22· cited 399×
• Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories
  California Supreme Court· 1980-03-20· cited 373×
• Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Challoner
  Supreme Court· 1975-11-03· cited 323×
• Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1989-04-04· cited 207×
• Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1984-09-11· cited 197×
• Martin v. Abbott Laboratories
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-10-04· cited 160×
• Benjamin H. Blackston, Wilmer L. Ring, John N. Turner, James N. Tanksley and Foster G. Hickox v. Shook and Fletcher Insulation Co., Ac & S, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-07-12· cited 158×
• Margo Lynch, Ppa Dennis Lynch, Dennis Lynch and Margaret Lynch v. Merrell-National Laboratories, Division of Richardson-Merrell, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1987-09-30· cited 114×
• Gaulding v. Celotex Corp.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1989-06-07· cited 104×
• John S. Porter v. Harold Nutter
  First Circuit· 1990-09-11· cited 94×
• Suzanne E. Tidler, and Helene Mankowitz v. Eli Lilly and Company
  D.C. Circuit· 1988-07-12· cited 88×
• Wilford Leroy Thompson, Jr. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-09-16· cited 79×
• Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.
  D. South Carolina· 1981-05-14· cited 79×
• Shackil v. Lederle Laboratories
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-07-31· cited 73×
• Cummins v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-07-05· cited 67×

Other cases named Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
  D. Massachusetts· 1992-07-02· cited 9×