Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that other factors, besides defendants’ lead pigment, may have caused or contributed to plaintiffs injury
• refusing to apply market share theory — and, therefore, to relax the identification requirement — because of the “possibility that the defendants did not cause the harm in question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).