Skip to main content

Cole v. State

Citations

  • 611 S.W.2d 79
  • 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a variance in the cause number of a prior offense was not fatal when the other information in the indictment was correct.
  • holding that variance between cause number alleged, 87954, and cause number proved, 87594, not material because no evidence of prejudicial surprise
  • holding that transpositional error in cause number of prior conviction alleged in enhancement paragraph did not create fatal variance between indictment and proof at trial because paragraph described prior conviction as felony, exact nature of offense as theft, and date and court of conviction
  • where indictment alleged cause no. 87954 and proof referred to cause number 87594, no fatal variance
  • before the sufficiency of allegations in an enhancement paragraph may be challenged on appeal, the defendant must have moved, in the trial court, to quash the enhancement provision in the indictment
  • ―In alleging a prior conviction for enhancement of punishment the allegations should include the court in which the conviction was obtained, the time of the conviction and the nature of the offense.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dally, W. C. Davis and Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.