Ninth Circuit· 1/16/1998
Santamaria v. Horsley
Citations
- 133 F.3d 1242
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 449
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 609
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 587
- 1998 WL 12648
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A court need not determine whether 28 defendant was prejudiced by counsel’s alleged deficiencies if it determines that counsel’s 1 performance was not deficient.”
- reviewing pretrial habeas petition under sec. 2241
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Fernandez, Hawkins, Kleinfeld, Kozinski, Pregerson, Rymer, Thomas, Thompson, Trott, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Montez v. McKinnaTenth Circuit· 2000-04-03· cited 1,009×
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionNinth Circuit· 2000-02-18· cited 496×
- Rollerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-27· cited 296×
- Benjamin Wai Silva v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, San Quentin State PrisonNinth Circuit· 2002-02-22· cited 284×
- Victor Manuel Solis v. Rosie GarciaNinth Circuit· 2000-07-12· cited 155×
- Gary Dwayne Bruce v. Cal Terhune California Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-07-19· cited 137×
- Steven Donald Stow v. Albert MurashigeNinth Circuit· 2004-11-19· cited 136×
- Wilson v. BellequeNinth Circuit· 2009-02-05· cited 119×
- People v. GuillenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-07-07· cited 104×
- Sivak v. HardisonNinth Circuit· 2011-09-07· cited 93×
- Robert E. Kennedy v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2004-08-18· cited 76×
- People v. CatlinCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-09-26· cited 73×
- State v. EgglestonWashington Supreme Court· 2008-07-10· cited 68×
- Chris Jacobs, Applicant v. Gary R. McCaughtrySeventh Circuit· 2001-05-09· cited 61×
- People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-12-21· cited 37×
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-10-03· cited 35×
- United States v. WittigTenth Circuit· 2009-08-10· cited 30×
- United States v. Pimentel-LopezNinth Circuit· 2016-07-15· cited 28×
- United States v. James Grant, IIINinth Circuit· 2012-06-11· cited 27×
- Johnson v. NelsonS.D. California· 2001-04-10· cited 23×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court· 1973-02-28· cited 2,787×
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court· 1997-01-06· cited 1,575×
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
- Schiro v. FarleySupreme Court· 1994-01-19· cited 550×
- Wainwright v. GoodeSupreme Court· 1983-11-28· cited 499×
- People v. SantamariaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-11-28· cited 243×
- Martinez-Villareal v. LewisNinth Circuit· 1996-04-04· cited 145×
- Blue v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1996-12-09· cited 116×
- United States v. Murdock Head, (Two Cases)Fourth Circuit· 1983-02-10· cited 98×
- United States v. John Allen SeleyNinth Circuit· 1992-02-25· cited 48×
- James Pettaway v. Charles Plummer, Sheriff of Alameda CountyNinth Circuit· 1991-08-23· cited 47×
- Troy Isaiah MITCHELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. K.W. PRUNTY, Chief Deputy Warden, Respondent-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1997-04-10· cited 46×
- People v. SantamariaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-04-12· cited 46×
- City of Moreno Valley v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court· 1997-10-14· cited 45×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cheryl PUTRA, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1996-03-05· cited 36×
- United States v. Lawton Scott MockFifth Circuit· 1979-10-09· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.