United States v. James Grant, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an association “through family . . . affiliation” is insufficient to establish probable cause
• explaining that an otherwise sufficient warrant application may become stale absent “a continuing pattern or other good reasons” suggesting that evidence remains in the location to be searched
• explaining that an otherwise sufficient warrant application may become stale absent “a continuing pattern or other good reasons” suggesting that evidence remains in the location to be searched
• reviewing for clear error decision to issue search warrant and giving “great deference” to an issuing judge’s probable cause finding
• establishing no reasonable nexus where the warrant connected only unrelated individuals to the evidence and location searched

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).