Skip to main content
· 8/23/1991

James Pettaway v. Charles Plummer, Sheriff of Alameda County

Citations

  • 943 F.2d 1041
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 10360
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6813
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19318
  • 1991 WL 160481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court's rejection of one of two alternative grounds for civil forfeiture, when it accepted the other ground, was necessary to its judgment
  • “The primary purpose of the rule that prior resolution of an issue will have collateral estoppel effect only if it was necessarily decided is to ensure that the finder of fact in the first case took sufficient care in determining the issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Noonan, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.