Sanford v. RDA Consultants, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding language that said former employee could “not to attempt to employ or assist any other person in employing or soliciting for employment any employee employed by [former employer]”
• upholding a covenant barring the appellant from “attempt[ing] to employ or assist any other person in employing or soliciting for employment” any of his prior employer’s employees for one year after his employment ended, despite the absence of a territorial limitation
• employee agreed “not to attempt to employ or assist any other person in employing or soliciting for employment any employee employed by RDA”
• injunction issued by the trial court prohibiting defendant from using or disclosing any of the plaintiff’s “proprietary materials” lacked sufficient detail
• “[A] prohibition against doing business with any of an employer’s customers, whether or not a relationship existed between the customer and the former employee, is overbroad.” (punctuation omitted)
• upholding an employee non-recruitment provision that lacked a geographic limitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).