Wolff v. Protege Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing issuance of injunction supported only by “mere allegations and conclusions unsupported by facts showing a violation, or at least a substantial threat of imminent violation,” of a covenant
• plaintiff not entitled to relief under DTPA because it failed to offer evidence that defendant tried to “pass off” its services as those of plaintiff
• “[T]his covenant is unenforceable because it purports to prevent [the employee] from obtaining employment with any competitor in any capacity. Such a restriction has repeatedly been held to be overbroad, unreasonable, and prohibited by the Georgia Constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).