Skip to main content

Sanders v. State

Citations

  • 646 S.W.2d 14
  • 278 Ark. 420
  • 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although the circuit court permitted the prosecuting attorney to go beyond the purpose of voir dire, there was no motion for a mistrial or admonition and therefore no prejudicial error occurred
  • holding that even though the circuit court permitted the prosecuting attorney to go beyond the purpose of voir dire, there was no motion for a mistrial or admonition; thus, there was no prejudicial error
  • trial court allowed prosecutor to go beyond the purpose of voir dire in his comments, but since appellant had not moved for a mistrial or requested an admonition, there was no prejudicial error
  • trial court allowed prosecutor to go beyond the purpose of voir dire in his comments, but since appellant had not moved for a mistrial or requested an admonition, there was no prejudicial error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.