Skip to main content

Hutcheson v. State

Citations

  • 213 S.W.3d 25
  • 92 Ark. App. 307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that because the State was merely posing questions to the jury to establish that the 18 jury pool understood the concept of parental duty, a key issue in that case, the questions were a permissible use of voir dire examination
  • “The purposes of voir dire examination are to discover if there is any basis for challenges for cause and to gain knowledge for the intelligent exercise of peremptory challenges. Those purposes do not include an attempt to commit the jurors to a decision in advance.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andree Layton Roaf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.