Brazel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• crediting mother for being “a second-year college student . . . enrolled in on-line college courses”
• crediting mother for being “a second-year college student. . . enrolled in on-line college courses”
• although mother did not have verifiable proof of income, she had maintained stable housing and her prospects for future employment were high
• “DFCS was required to present at the termination hearing evidence of present deprivation, not past or potential future deprivation”
• “DFCS was required to present at the termination hearing evidence of present deprivation, not past or potential future deprivation”
• where child is not in parent’s physical custody, DFCS may show present deprivation by showing that, if child were returned to parent at time of hearing, child would be deprived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).