Missouri Court of Appeals· 1/27/2011
Sanchez v. State
Citations
- 330 S.W.3d 847
- 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 75
- 2011 WL 287844
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting ineffective-assistance claim based on counsel's failure to request interpreter because defendant \failed to demonstrate that he was unable to fully comprehend\ proceedings and attorney did not have problems communicating with him
- rejecting ineffective-assistance claim based on counsel’s failure to request interpreter because defendant “failed to demonstrate that he was unable to fully comprehend” proceedings and attorney did not have problems communicating with him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert S. Barney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-02-24· cited 273×
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2005-05-31· cited 246×
- State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-12-21· cited 205×
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2000-01-11· cited 183×
- Wright v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-12-17· cited 14×
- Watts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-04-07· cited 10×
- Berry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-05-31· cited 8×
- State v. JadamaCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2010-04-29· cited 6×
- Munoz v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-11-24· cited 6×
- Garces v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-10-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.