Skip to main content

Cockrell, Darrell Lynn

Citations

  • 424 S.W.3d 543
  • 2014 WL 941358
  • 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “whether the trial court should have realized that applicant had a hearing impairment . . . is pertinent when the complaint relates to whether the trial court committed error by failing to appoint an interpreter”
  • noting that “whether the trial court should have realized that applicant had a hearing impairment . . . is pertinent when the complaint relates to whether the trial court committed error by failing to appoint an interpreter”
  • finding prejudice requirement met where defense attorney did not get needed interpreter so that defendant could fully participate in proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Keller, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Cochran, Keasler, Hervey, Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cockrell, Darrell Lynn

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.