Supreme Court of Iowa· 2/18/2005

Sanchez v. State

Citations

692 N.W.2d 812
16 A.L.R. 6th 825
2005 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 27
2005 WL 387546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting we would not apply different analyses under the Iowa and federal constitutions when the parties have not articulated a reason for doing so
noting that neither party argued for a different standard
noting we would not apply different analyses under the Iowa and federal constitutions when the parties have not articulated a reason for doing so
noting that neither party argued for a different standard
noting that neither party argued for a different standard
“Because neither party in this case has argued that our equal protection analysis under the Iowa Constitution should differ in any way from our analysis under the Federal Constitution, we decline to apply divergent analyses in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.