Spiker v. Spiker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between the parties’ claims about law of the case with res judicata and resolving the case under the latter doctrine
• considering an application for appellate attorney fees in a modification action
• requiring “a final judgment on the merits in the first action”
• citation 2 This record does not contain a transcript of the modification hearing. 4 omitted
• “The doctrine of res judicata embraces the concepts of claim preclusion and issue preclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).