Sanborn v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An attempt simply to repeat the prior inquiry, without some particularized showing, is not adequate. Such is not a proper use of Rule 6’s discovery tools.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Michel v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
• Bracy v. Gramley
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-09· cited 1,476×
• Affronti v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1955-12-05· cited 1,308×
• Harris v. Nelson
  Supreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
• Montana v. Egelhoff
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 816×
• Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-Appellee
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-08-16· cited 702×
• Joseph Cooper v. Dewey Sowders, Warden, Northpoint Training Center
  Sixth Circuit· 1988-01-21· cited 177×
• Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Robert Henry Nicolaus, Real-Party-In-Interest
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-22· cited 159×
• John Petrucelli v. Phillip Coombe, Jr., Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility
  Second Circuit· 1984-05-18· cited 147×
• Marty O'Shea Franklin v. James Rose
  Sixth Circuit· 1987-02-13· cited 146×
• Sanborn v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1995-03-23· cited 43×
• Payne v. Bell
  W.D. Tennessee· 2000-02-15· cited 24×