Marty O'Shea Franklin v. James Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an argument in state court challenging an evidentiary ruling based solely on state evidence rules was insufficient to apprize the state court of the federal constitutional claim
• “For a claim to be exhausted, the state court system must have been apprised of the facts and legal theory upon which petitioner bases his assertion.”
• “For a claim to be exhausted, the state court system must have been apprised of the facts and legal theory upon which petitioner bases his assertion.”
• “The ways in which a state defendant may fairly present to the state courts the constitutional nature of his claim, even without citing chapter and verse of the Constitution, include (a) reliance on pertinent federal cases employing constitutional analysis, (b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).