California Court of Appeal· 11/14/2011
San Francisco Opera Ass'n v. Flickinger
Citations
- 201 Cal. App. 4th 971
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘It is fundamental that ‘damages which are speculative, remote, imaginary, contingent, 26 or merely possible cannot serve as a legal basis for recovery.’” (brackets and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lambden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-02-14· cited 85×
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2014-11-05· cited 46×
- Williamson v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-01-31· cited 28×
- Estate v. HerzogCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-03-29· cited 18×
- McLear-Gary v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-07-11· cited 10×
- Guess v. BernhardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-11-30
- Williamson v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-02-28
- Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-03-13
- Estate of PostCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-06-22
- McLear-Gary v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-07-11
- Scott v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-08-22
- Estate of HerzogCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-03-29
- Ring v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-12-15
- Estate of Post v. PostCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-06-22
- Scott v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-08-22
- Estate of FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2024-01-02
- Bird Rock Home Mortgage v. Breaking GroundCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2025-09-16
- Ehrenkranz v. S.F. Zen CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2026-03-02
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-10-01· cited 816×
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-13· cited 696×
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 334×
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-07-09· cited 281×
- ASP Properties Group, L.P. v. Fard, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-10-05· cited 148×
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 144×
- Miller v. Eisenhower Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-07-07· cited 119×
- Piscitelli v. FriedenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-03-14· cited 115×
- Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-12-17· cited 95×
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-12-10· cited 89×
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-11-01· cited 85×
- Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-03-15· cited 72×
- Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-07-26· cited 65×
- Magic Kitchen LLC v. Good Things International, Ltd.California Court of Appeal· 2007-07-30· cited 63×
- Parsons v. TicknerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-02-02· cited 57×
- Wilcox v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-11-29· cited 55×
- Carlson v. EassaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-04-24· cited 50×
- Westphal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1998-12-18· cited 49×
- City of Coachella v. Riverside County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-05-25· cited 45×
- O'DAY v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-08-29· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.