· 2/2/1995
Parsons v. Tickner
Citations
- 31 Cal. App. 4th 1513
- 37 Cal. Rptr. 2d 810
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 899
- 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 83
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a plaintiff has presumed knowledge where they have “the opportunity to obtain knowledge from sources open to [their] investigation (such as public records or corporation books)”
- stating that a 11 plaintiff has presumed knowledge where she has “the opportunity to obtain knowledge 12 from sources open to [her] investigation (such as public records or corporation books)”
- explaining there is no statutory 20 command for a § 377.32 declaration to be filed with a complaint
- “Literally, [section 377.24] does not require that the affidavit be filed as a condition precedent to commencing or continuing the action.”
- “[Section § 377.32] does not require that the affidavit be filed as a 20 condition precedent to commencing or continuing the action.”
- “failure to file the affidavit could possibly subject 7 the action to a plea in abatement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vogel (c.S.)
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.