Skip to main content
· 2/2/1995

Parsons v. Tickner

Citations

  • 31 Cal. App. 4th 1513
  • 37 Cal. Rptr. 2d 810
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 899
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 83

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a plaintiff has presumed knowledge where they have “the opportunity to obtain knowledge from sources open to [their] investigation (such as public records or corporation books)”
  • stating that a 11 plaintiff has presumed knowledge where she has “the opportunity to obtain knowledge 12 from sources open to [her] investigation (such as public records or corporation books)”
  • explaining there is no statutory 20 command for a § 377.32 declaration to be filed with a complaint
  • “Literally, [section 377.24] does not require that the affidavit be filed as a condition precedent to commencing or continuing the action.”
  • “[Section § 377.32] does not require that the affidavit be filed as a 20 condition precedent to commencing or continuing the action.”
  • “failure to file the affidavit could possibly subject 7 the action to a plea in abatement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogel (c.S.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.