Skip to main content
· 6/12/2000

Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Citations

  • 1 P.3d 63
  • 96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 747
  • 23 Cal. 4th 305
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 6173
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4657
  • 2000 Cal. LEXIS 4551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a claim akin to promissory estoppel when the government failed to award a project to the lowest bidder in violation of applicable laws
  • noting that, ordinarily, “consideration must be given in exchange for the promise sought to be enforced” (citation omitted)
  • limiting promissory estoppel claim to reliance damages in context of suit against public entity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.