Skip to main content
· 4/21/2010

Alcala v. Employment Department

Citations

  • 230 P.3d 59
  • 235 Or. App. 32
  • 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the board’s failure to explain how, or why, conduct could reasonably be deemed to be “disrespectful” was an announcement, not an explanation
  • substantial evidence review requires us to ensure that the EAB’s decision “ ‘articulates the reasoning that leads from the facts found to the conclusions drawn’ ”
  • order not supported by substantial reason where the board “did not explain” its conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.