· 4/21/2010
Alcala v. Employment Department
Citations
- 230 P.3d 59
- 235 Or. App. 32
- 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 410
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the board’s failure to explain how, or why, conduct could reasonably be deemed to be “disrespectful” was an announcement, not an explanation
- substantial evidence review requires us to ensure that the EAB’s decision “ ‘articulates the reasoning that leads from the facts found to the conclusions drawn’ ”
- order not supported by substantial reason where the board “did not explain” its conclusion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.