SAIF Corp. v. Paxton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the board’s finding was not supported by substantial evidence where it unreasonably misinterpreted an expert’s opinion regarding the cause of the claimant’s hearing loss
• where there was only one reasonable interpretation of doctor’s opinion regarding cause of claimant’s hearing loss and the board found the doctor’s opinion to be otherwise, the board’s finding was not supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kenimer v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-31· cited 6×
• Armenta v. PCC Structural, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-05· cited 4×
• RLC Industries v. Sun Studs, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-01-31· cited 1×
• Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Kaleta
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-14· cited 1×
• Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Sams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-04-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-02-22· cited 125×
• Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-01-10· cited 58×
• Roseburg Forest Products v. Long
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-05-22· cited 26×
• FMC Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-10-24· cited 10×
• FMC Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-04-17· cited 9×