Kenimer v. SAIF Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “only one reasonable interpretation of the basis for [an expert’s] opinion”
• “[A] claimant’s combined condition is compensable if the work injury *** is the major contributing cause of the need for treatment of the combined condition.”
• “We cannot review for substantial evidence if we cannot discern an agency’s rationale.”
• “We cannot review for substantial evidence if we cannot discern an agency’s rationale.”
• where there was only one reasonable interpretation of a doctor’s opinion regarding cause of the claimant’s hearing loss and the board found the doctor’s opinion to be otherwise, the board’s finding was not supported by substantial evidence
• finding “only one reasonable interpretation” of an expert’s opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).